| Author |
Topic: Check Out Funky nac 42 on Ebay. WHAT IS
THAT!!!? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil
Sparks Member |
posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:06 
odd 42
I might be being stupid (or maybe its just the crummy
resolution on my monitor) but in the picture
(www.cybureau.com/4sale/naimboards.jpg)the extra board doesn't
actually seem to be connected to anything, also the far right
hand side din (looking from the back) also seems to be lacking
any wires.
However I'd also guess it's the active 42 - presumably they
sold it "un-active" but with everything installed so a dealer
could just hook up the active bits when required.
There was one of these advertised on Loot a few months ago
for IIRC around £150. I almost bought it just out of curiosity
- very cheap to get something similar to a 92/ixo. There was
something appealing in a real 'mullet' system say this amp, a
couple of old 160s (could it be powered from one (or both?) of
the power amps) and something difficult to drive like a pair
of Saras.
Phil
Posts:
225 | From: London,
UK | Registered: THURSDAY 03 August
2000 | |
|
|
Better off
without Vuk? I think not. Member |
posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:24  
smells like a 42-XO...
Yeah, looking at it some more, my deduction is it's a
42-XO, as it has two 240 degree DIN-4's, which is unusual in a
42, I think.
Pretty sure my old 42 wasn't like that, anyway.
Anyone from Naim like to put us out of misery?
Rico - musichead
Posts:
1164 | From: Global
Citizen | Registered: MONDAY 31 July
2000 | |
|
|
Phil
Sparks Member |
posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:50 
smug or what?
me:
quote:
However I'd also guess it's the active 42 - presumably they
sold it "un-active" but with everything installed
Mark:
quote:
It's a 42XO without the crossover connected, most of them
ended up this way!
lots of potential FEPs in this thread methinks
Phil
Posts:
225 | From: London,
UK | Registered: THURSDAY 03 August
2000 | |
Joe
Petrik Member |
posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 17:08 

FEPifesto
Phil,
quote:
...lots of potential FEPs in this thread methinks
OK, award yourself 15 FEPs for figuring out that the 42XO
was sold unactive, but subtract 40 FEPs if you actually used
the 42XO in the ultimate mulletted system: active with four
135s.
Recall the point about electronics from the FEP manifesto:
quote:
Does your preamp weigh 5 pounds and your power amp weigh
500? If yes, subtract 40 points.
Joe
Posts:
431 | From: the U.S. of
eh | Registered: TUESDAY 29 August
2000 | |
teddy Member |
posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 17:38 

I actually had a 42xo with two 110s and Saras back in 1981,
loved it at the time; front end was an LP12/ittok/asak
'T'.
Posts:
9 | From:
England | Registered: THURSDAY 30 November
2000 | |
|
|
Phil
Sparks Member |
posted FRIDAY 01 December 2000 14:37 
PSUs
Teddy
I'm interested in your 42/110/110 setup. Did you have a
snaps/HiCap or did one of the 110s power the 42? If so which
one? left or right or where they configured to be tweeters and
woofers?
Naims wisdom was generally that you should go for a 250
rather than go the active route with a lesser power amp. How
did you end up there?
Phil
Posts:
225 | From: London,
UK | Registered: THURSDAY 03 August
2000 | |
|
|