Visit the Naim E-Store Visit the unofficial Naim FAQ

 Post New TopicNote: Polls are considered new topics.  If you post a poll, it will be created as a new subject in this forum, not as a reply within this topic. Topic Replies: PopIt!Post A Reply
MyPop™ | register | search | faq | forum home


PreviousGo to the next oldest topic in this forum Go to the next newest topic in this forumNext
  Naim Audio Main Website » naim-audio.infopop.net » The Hi-Fi Corner » Check Out Funky nac 42 on Ebay. WHAT IS THAT!!!?

Email this page to someone!
Author Topic:   Check Out Funky nac 42 on Ebay. WHAT IS THAT!!!?
juddson
Junior Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 15:19 Click Here to See the Profile for juddsonClick Here to Email juddson   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
There'as a nac 42 for auction on ebay with a strange add-on circuit board on the right side of the pre-amp. From the picture, it appears to use the same parts as Naim does (same cap manufacturers, etc.) but I've owned this pre-amp and mine had no such circuit board. Anybody know what that thing is.

Judd


Posts: 1 | From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA | Registered: THURSDAY 30 November 2000
Tony Lonorgan
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 15:27 Click Here to See the Profile for Tony LonorganClick Here to Email Tony Lonorgan   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
quote:
There'as a nac 42 for auction on ebay with a strange add-on circuit board on the right side of the pre-amp. From the picture, it appears to use the same parts as Naim does (same cap manufacturers, etc.) but I've owned this pre-amp and mine had no such circuit board. Anybody know what that thing is.


I have only seen inside the 42.5 and 62, not the original 42, the picture bears no resemblance to either I have seen. Weird. Seems to have an extra output too, is it a 42XO (had a built in crossover for active)?

Oh, its here www.cybureau.com/4sale/naimboards.jpg to save hunting around ebay.

Tony.


Posts: 1411 | From: The flat earth (485 FEPs). | Registered: MONDAY 31 July 2000
Better off without Vuk? I think not.
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 15:29 Click Here to See the Profile for Better off without Vuk?  I think not.Click Here to Email Better off without Vuk?  I think not.   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
any FEP's for me?

That's not an active 42, is it?

Rico - musichead


Posts: 1164 | From: Global Citizen | Registered: MONDAY 31 July 2000
Tony Lonorgan
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 15:32 Click Here to See the Profile for Tony LonorganClick Here to Email Tony Lonorgan   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
quote:
That's not an active 42, is it?

Pah, both came to that conclusion at once, you will have to share your FEPs.

Tony.


Posts: 1411 | From: The flat earth (485 FEPs). | Registered: MONDAY 31 July 2000
Better off without Vuk? I think not.
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 15:56 Click Here to See the Profile for Better off without Vuk?  I think not.Click Here to Email Better off without Vuk?  I think not.   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
'NaimSpotting'

yeah, but sharing aside, you at least remembered it's correct name... so you win the FEP's (assuming it's correct), and the NaimSpotter's badge!

NaimSpotting - coming to a trendy theatre near you...

Rico - musichead


Posts: 1164 | From: Global Citizen | Registered: MONDAY 31 July 2000
Phil Sparks
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:06 Click Here to See the Profile for Phil Sparks   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
odd 42

I might be being stupid (or maybe its just the crummy resolution on my monitor) but in the picture (www.cybureau.com/4sale/naimboards.jpg)the extra board doesn't actually seem to be connected to anything, also the far right hand side din (looking from the back) also seems to be lacking any wires.

However I'd also guess it's the active 42 - presumably they sold it "un-active" but with everything installed so a dealer could just hook up the active bits when required.

There was one of these advertised on Loot a few months ago for IIRC around £150. I almost bought it just out of curiosity - very cheap to get something similar to a 92/ixo. There was something appealing in a real 'mullet' system say this amp, a couple of old 160s (could it be powered from one (or both?) of the power amps) and something difficult to drive like a pair of Saras.

Phil


Posts: 225 | From: London, UK | Registered: THURSDAY 03 August 2000
Stevie D
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:11 Click Here to See the Profile for Stevie DClick Here to Email Stevie D   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Short, back and sides

Front and rear shots. On all fours

Check 'em out here


Steve


Posts: 190 | From: Constant Variable | Registered: MONDAY 31 July 2000
Better off without Vuk? I think not.
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:24 Click Here to See the Profile for Better off without Vuk?  I think not.Click Here to Email Better off without Vuk?  I think not.   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
smells like a 42-XO...

Yeah, looking at it some more, my deduction is it's a 42-XO, as it has two 240 degree DIN-4's, which is unusual in a 42, I think.

Pretty sure my old 42 wasn't like that, anyway.

Anyone from Naim like to put us out of misery?

Rico - musichead


Posts: 1164 | From: Global Citizen | Registered: MONDAY 31 July 2000
Mark Tucker
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:38 Click Here to See the Profile for Mark TuckerClick Here to Email Mark Tucker   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
It's a 42XO without the crossover connected, most of them ended up this way!

[This message was edited by Mark Tucker on THURSDAY 30 November 2000 at 16:44.]


Posts: 150 | From: Salisbury, England | Registered: TUESDAY 18 July 2000
Phil Sparks
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 16:50 Click Here to See the Profile for Phil Sparks   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
smug or what?

me:
quote:
However I'd also guess it's the active 42 - presumably they sold it "un-active" but with everything installed

Mark:
quote:
It's a 42XO without the crossover connected, most of them ended up this way!

lots of potential FEPs in this thread methinks

Phil


Posts: 225 | From: London, UK | Registered: THURSDAY 03 August 2000
Joe Petrik
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 17:08 Click Here to See the Profile for Joe PetrikClick Here to Email Joe Petrik   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
FEPifesto

Phil,

quote:
...lots of potential FEPs in this thread methinks

OK, award yourself 15 FEPs for figuring out that the 42XO was sold unactive, but subtract 40 FEPs if you actually used the 42XO in the ultimate mulletted system: active with four 135s.

Recall the point about electronics from the FEP manifesto:

quote:
Does your preamp weigh 5 pounds and your power amp weigh 500? If yes, subtract 40 points.

Joe


Posts: 431 | From: the U.S. of eh | Registered: TUESDAY 29 August 2000
teddy
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 17:38 Click Here to See the Profile for teddyClick Here to Email teddy   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
I actually had a 42xo with two 110s and Saras back in 1981, loved it at the time; front end was an LP12/ittok/asak 'T'.

Posts: 9 | From: England | Registered: THURSDAY 30 November 2000
Mark Ellis-Jones
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted THURSDAY 30 November 2000 18:03 Click Here to See the Profile for Mark Ellis-JonesClick Here to Email Mark Ellis-Jones   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Fascinating, but disturbing...

That's our carpet it's on...

(I still don't like this
software very much)


Posts: 390 | From: Western UK | Registered: THURSDAY 17 August 2000
Phil Sparks
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted FRIDAY 01 December 2000 14:37 Click Here to See the Profile for Phil Sparks   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
PSUs

Teddy

I'm interested in your 42/110/110 setup. Did you have a snaps/HiCap or did one of the 110s power the 42? If so which one? left or right or where they configured to be tweeters and woofers?

Naims wisdom was generally that you should go for a 250 rather than go the active route with a lesser power amp. How did you end up there?

Phil


Posts: 225 | From: London, UK | Registered: THURSDAY 03 August 2000
teddy
Member
This is an icon describing the mood of the topic or describing information contained in the topic. For more info on icons, read our FAQ. posted FRIDAY 01 December 2000 16:12 Click Here to See the Profile for teddyClick Here to Email teddy   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
As I remember it one of the 110s powered the preamp and the other the 2-way crossover. Later on I added a SNAPS.

I think Naim soon tired of this approach, suggesting that a good passive system was better than a cheap active one. (i.e. 1 x 160 being better than 2 x 110s)

I agreed, I sold the amps and speakers and ended up with a 32/SNAPS/250 and Isobariks which I kept for a number of years.


Posts: 9 | From: England | Registered: THURSDAY 30 November 2000

All times are GMT
Post New TopicNote: Polls are considered new topics.  If you post a poll, it will be created as a new subject in this forum, not as a reply within this topic. Topic Replies: PopIt!Post A Reply Topic: Close TopicClose   Manage TopicManage   Delete TopicDelete PreviousGo to the next oldest topic in this forum Go to the next newest topic in this forumNext
Rate Topic:

Hop To: 


Contact Us | Naim Audio Main Website

© Naim Audio Ltd, 2000.

OpenTopic™ 2.1.3